Downloadable Papers
2009: Long-distance bound local anaphors in Korean: an empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin
Paper co-authored with Ji-Hye Kim, where we investigate the long-distance ‘exempt’ binding of the local anaphor caki-casin using a grammaticality judgment and preferential interpretation task. We argue that caki-casin can be bound long-distance as a local anaphor. The findings also suggest that contrary to earlier belief local anaphors (such as caki-casin) in Korean may not violate TSC, and when they do, they function as exempt anaphors. Near final version of paper to appear in Lingua.
2009: Binding interpretations of anaphors by heritage speakers of Korean
Paper co-authored with Ji-Hye Kim and Silvina Montrul, where we investigate the interpretations of binding of three Korean anaphors (caki, casin, caki-casin) by heritage speakers of Korean (early bilinguals), comparing them with late bilinguals and monolinguals. We argue for effects of transfer and incomplete acquisition in the grammar of heritage speakers. Near-final version of paper to appear in Language Acquisition 16.1.
2008: An experimental syntactic study of binding of multiple anaphors in Korean
Paper co-authored with Ji-Hye Kim, which expands on the results of the
Korean monolinguals reported in Kim, Montrul, Yoon (2009), with additional
subjects and a more in-depth analysis. It argues that the bimodal distribution
in the grammar of casin
reflects an on-going change in Korean, and backs up the argument with data from
the history of Bible translations. In Journal of Cognitive Science 9.1 (pp. 1-30),
2007: The distribution of subject properties in multiple subject constructions
Paper
argues that Multiple Subject Constructions possess multiple subjects and
discusses the distribution of subject properties in MSCs
and why they are distributed the way they are. Based on
invited presentations at the 2006 Linguistic Society of Korea Summer
International Conference (
2007: Raising of Major Arguments in Korean and Japanese
Paper argues that Subject-to-Object Raising in Korean (and Japanese) targets embedded Major Subjects. The Major Subject raising analysis is compared to a base-generation (Prolepsis, Major Object) analysis and shown to be superior. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25:615-653
(Also in Bill Davies and Stan Dubinsky eds., New Horizons in the Grammar of Raising and Control, pp. 71-107, Springer Verlag).
2005: Conjunction
reduction and its consequences for noun phrase morphosyntax
in Korean
Paper co-authored with Wooseung
Lee. Paper argues that apparent conjunction of case-marked NP with case-marked
NP in Korean is not constituent coordination, but elliptical coordination and
explores the consequences of the analysis for the morphosyntactic
status of nominal particles, such as case-markers. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference
on Formal Linguistics-24,
379-387, John Alderete et.
al. eds.,
2005: Non-morphological
determination of nominal particle ordering in Korean
Paper argues that principles that govern the sequencing
of nominal inflectional particles in Korean are syntactic in nature. In Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical
Perspectives, L. Heggie
and F. Ordonez (eds), pp.
239-282, John Benjamins.
2004: The
independence of grammatical case from interpretive factors
Paper argues that grammatical case-markers do not
function ambiguously as markers of information structure, such as Topic and
Focus. Expands the theme in Yoon 2004 and provides additional evidence that the
special information associated with Major Subjects does not arise from the
case-markers. In I-H Lee et. al.
eds., Proceedings of the LSK 2004
International Conference, Linguistic Society of
2004: Process nominals and morphological complexity
Paper
argues that recent attempts to restrict argument-bearing nominals
to deverbal nominals are
too restrictive, and that J/K verbal nouns are argument-bearing. Paper based on
invited presentation, 13th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference,
2004: Non-nominative
(Major) Subjects and Case Stacking in Korean
Paper argues that Nominative case stacking in Korean
should be reanalyzed as Nom-assignment to a non-nominative Major Subject. In P.
Bhaskararao and K. V. Subbarao
eds., Non-nominative Subjects, Volume
2, pp. 265-314, Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
2002: What
the Korean copula reveals about the interaction of morphology and syntax
Paper based on keynote presentation, 11th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference, UCSB. The central argument in the paper is that the complex morphotactics involving the affixal copula can be accounted for syntactically. In Japanese-Korean Linguistics 11, edited by Pat Clancy, CSLI Publications, pp. 34-50.
1997: Coordination
Asymmetries
Paper responds to the position that takes
–ko
coordination to be subordination based on the asymmetry of marking and
extraction from certain –ko
coordinations. I argue that –ko is
ambiguous between an adjunct marker and a conjunct marker and that when it
functions as a conjunct marker, the structure is fully symmetrical, with
respect to both morphosyntactic marking and
extraction. In Harvard Studies in Korean
Linguistics, eds. S. Kuno et.
al, Vol 7, 3-30.
1996: A
syntactic approach to category-changing phrasal morphology: nominalizations in
Korean and English
Paper
develops the idea in Yoon (1996) and suggests an implementation of phrasal
conversion and ad-phrasal affixation in minimalist terms. In Morphosyntax in Generative Grammar, Hee-don Ahn, et. al. eds., Hankuk Publishing Company,
1996: Nominal
Gerund Phrases in English as Phrasal Zero Derivations
Paper argues that nominal gerunds in
English are derived by zero derivation (conversion) applying to phrases in
syntax. In Linguistics Vol. 34,
329-356
1994: Lexical
integrity and the morphosyntax of verbal inflection
in Korean verbal coordination
Longer version of 1994: "Korean Inflection and Checking Theory," MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: The Morphology-Syntax Connection, C. Philip & H. Harley eds., Department of Linguistics, MIT, pp. 251-270.
1994: Korean Verbal Inflection and Checking Theory
Paper argues against checking-theoretic and head-movement based analyses of verbal inflections in Korean and defends an ad-phrasal affixation analysis. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: The Morphology-Syntax Connection, C. Philip and H. Harley eds., pp. 251-270, Department of Linguistics, MIT.
1992: On the Composition of COMP and Parameters of V2
Paper argues for the decomposition of COMP into two categories and explores the consequences of the decomposition for analyses of symmetric vs. asymmetric V2. In Proceedings of WCCFL 10, Dawn Bates ed., pp.41-52, Stanford Linguistic Association.